Legislature(2005 - 2006)CAPITOL 124
01/17/2006 05:00 PM House OIL & GAS
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Overview from Department of Natural Resources - Division of Oil & Gas | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
ALASKA STATE LEGISLATURE
HOUSE SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON OIL AND GAS
January 17, 2006
5:07 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Lesil McGuire
Representative Norman Rokeberg
Representative Ralph Samuels
Representative Nancy Dahlstrom
Representative Berta Gardner
Representative David Guttenberg
MEMBERS ABSENT
Representative Vic Kohring, Chair
OTHER MEMBERS PRESENT
Representative Kurt Olson
Representative Jim Holm
Representative Mike Kelly
COMMITTEE CALENDAR
OVERVIEW FROM DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - DIVISION OF OIL
& GAS
- HEARD
PREVIOUS COMMITTEE ACTION
No previous action to record
WITNESS REGISTER
BILL VAN DYKE, Acting Director
Division of Oil & Gas (DOG)
Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
Anchorage, Alaska
POSITION STATEMENT: Presented an overview from the Division of
Oil & Gas, Department of Natural Resources.
ACTION NARRATIVE
REPRESENTATIVE RALPH SAMUELS, acting as Chair, called the House
Special Committee on Oil and Gas meeting to order at 5:07:44 PM.
Representatives McGuire, Samuels, Dahlstrom, Gardner, and
Guttenberg were present at the call to order. Representative
Rokeberg arrived as the meeting was in progress. Also in
attendance were Representatives Olson, Holm, and Kelly.
^OVERVIEW FROM DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - DIVISION OF OIL
& GAS
5:07:57 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SAMUELS announced that the first order of
business would be an overview from the Division of Oil & Gas,
Department of Natural Resources.
5:08:32 PM
BILL VAN DYKE, Acting Director, Division of Oil & Gas (DOG),
Department of Natural Resources (DNR), announced that he would
be referring to the handout entitled "Alaska Oil and Gas
Activities". Slide 2, the state revenue pie, displayed
petroleum revenue sources for the fiscal year (FY) 2005. He
stated that for FY 2005, the non-petroleum unrestricted revenue
was 11 percent. Royalties, bonuses, rents, and settlements
totaled $1.9 [million]. Royalties to the Permanent Fund totaled
nearly 500 million dollars. Referring to slide 3, fiscal year
oil and gas revenue from state lands for fiscal years 1990-2005,
he explained that FY 2005 is the highest because of the rise in
commodity prices. The state is still benefiting from those
commodity prices this FY [2006].
5:10:48 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GUTTENBERG, referring to slide 3, asked for
clarification of the monetary amounts of the oil and gas
settlements.
5:11:10 PM
MR. VAN DYKE answered, "A couple million dollars, primarily from
royalty audits and settlements," adding that it's nothing like
the early 1990s, when there were major royalty settlements.
5:11:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SAMUELS inquired as to whether it was possible to
get a similar graph that accounts for inflation.
5:11:45 PM
MR. VAN DYKE confirmed that the DOG would be able to convert it
to whatever "dollars" the committee requests. For example, 1990
"dollars."
5:12:12 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 4, described the organization
"links" of the DOG. The division takes a "team approach" in
accomplishing their mission, and also utilizes the Department of
Law (DOL) and the Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys
(DGGS).
5:12:51 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 5, described some of the DOG's
continuing projects, which range from the sciences, to audits,
to accounting, to commercial land, as well as to recruitment.
Currently in the oil and gas industry, hiring is competitive and
the state has lost employees to other oil and gas companies.
5:13:45 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG, referring to the continuing project of
crafting new, 10-year best interest findings for the state's
lease sales, beginning in 2007, asked if 2007 was the tenure
date for the areawide leasing program.
5:14:05 PM
MR. VAN DYKE confirmed that through the areawide leasing
program, the DOG is able to do a "best interest" finding, which
can last up to 10 years. It is refreshed each year, but the DOG
doesn't have to go through the entire finding process again. He
informed the committee that the 10-year "sunset dates" are
starting to "roll up", beginning in 2007.
5:14:25 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG requested that Mr. Van Dyke discuss the
status of the governor's change in the production tax last year.
He also asked whether there are ongoing negotiations with the
various companies.
5:14:45 PM
MR. VAN DYKE asked if Representative Rokeberg was referring to
the "aggregation at Prudhoe Bay."
5:14:53 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG added that the economic limit factor
(ELF) for the production tax applicability to the satellite
field was changed.
5:15:01 PM
MR. VAN DYKE informed Representative Rokeberg that he is not
involved in the negotiation. He then offered his understanding
that some appeals have been filed in the Department of Revenue
(DOR).
5:15:19 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 6, informed the committee that
with the upcoming gaseline and the increase in workload, the DOG
received some supplemental funding about a year and a half ago.
The money runs out at the end of this fiscal year. If the state
doesn't get the money replenished, and the DOG is asking for
general fund money to replace what is now supplemental, the DOG
will lose about 13 people, which is about 15 percent of the DOG
staff. He opined, "Now's not the time to take a 15 percent cut
in oil and gas activity."
5:16:08 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slides 7 and 8 and division
highlights, said that in calendar year 2005, the state collected
over $2 billion in rents, royalties, and settlements.
Currently, there are approximately 1,200 active oil and gas
leases, covering approximately 4 million acres and generating
approximately $6 million in rental income. Audits focus mainly
on transportation costs, most of which are marine transportation
costs, compared to pipeline transportation costs. Audit
employees also deal with the net profit share leases. The state
has an active royalty settlement "re-open" process, as a result
of the royalty settlement agreements the state entered into in
the 1990s and this process allows either party to re-open parts
of the deal when [oil and gas] conditions change. He added that
this process works well for both sides.
5:18:29 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SAMUELS referred to ongoing arbitration, and
commented, "I assume that we haven't received any of the [$]26
million yet."
5:18:42 PM
MR. VAN DYKE informed the committee that it will take a total of
three to four years to complete the [arbitration] process. He
explained that the state has already won the first part of the
arbitration process regarding destination value for the oil, and
that the second part, as yet unresolved pertains to marine
transportation. The state has made an offer and similarly,
ExxonMobil has made an offer. Whoever wins, transportation
costs are going to rise, which means the state's revenue will
decrease.
5:19:32 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SAMUELS inquired about the $997 million from
royalty in-kind (RIK) sales and whether it was sold in-state.
5:19:41 PM
MR. VAN DYKE responded that it was all sold locally to Flint
Hills. Currently the state doesn't have an oil contract with
Tesoro Alaska Company, or with any other oil purchasers. The
unit staff is "real busy" as a result of the new entrants coming
in. He stated that leases change hands as companies interested
in one area decide to sell out and purchase leases elsewhere.
There are over 1,000 assignments of interest annually. In
regard to royalty accounting, the state has more pools online,
more production for more pools, more players, more "working
interest" owners, and over 20,000 royalty transactions per year.
5:21:06 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GUTTENBERG asked where the production reports are
generated.
5:21:23 PM
MR. VAN DYKE informed the committee that most of the DOG's
reports come from the sales meters and from there the oil is
allocated back to the individual leases. The volumes are
recorded at the Lease Automated Custody Transfer (LACT) meters,
and the operator reports the volumes. He stated that the owners
of the leases pay the royalty, not the operator of the field.
He reported that the state's lease sale program is "alive and
well", and that the DOG has five sales per year. There is a
sale scheduled for March 1st, with the sale terms having been
announced last week.
5:22:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG inquired as to whether the state has
changed any of the terms for the new North Slope areawide sale.
5:22:39 PM
MR. VAN DYKE confirmed that the state did; the state shortened
some of the primary terms in some areas, but not in the most
remote areas. For some of the areas closer in, the state
shortened the primary term for the lease from seven years to
five years. In addition, in some of those areas, the state
increased the royalty from 12.5 percent to 16.66 percent. The
shorter lease term recognizes that there is better access today
than there was in the past, thus it's easier to begin drilling.
The royalty increase is a reflection of today's commodity
prices. He opined that the commodity prices will remain.
5:23:30 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG asked if the DOG analyzed the potential
impacts of the adjustments on development.
5:23:36 PM
MR. VAN DYKE informed the committee that the DOG has done some
analysis, particularly on relatively smaller pools. The
analysis looked at the changes in commodity prices, which is the
"real driver". He opined that the rates set by the state are
"very reasonable", and considerably lower, as are Alaska's
primary lease terms.
5:25:04 PM
MR. VAN DYKE stated that the DOG's resource evaluation staff has
conducted a lot of work for the Alaska Peninsula lease sale,
including distributing information to new entrants. The DOG is
continuing to do the same for the North Slope sale. He stated
that the more information the DOG generates on their website and
in public reports, the more interest there will be in the oil
and gas leasing program. The DOG issued its first gas storage
lease in the Cook Inlet area a couple of months ago and
currently has another lease being processed. The gas storage
lease industry is critical to meeting the gas demand in Cook
Inlet in the winter.
5:27:05 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 9, explained royalty settlement
"re-openers" as an arbitration process. Two sides are able to
agree on a change to a royalty settlement agreement voluntarily,
but if they aren't able to come to an agreement, they enter into
an arbitration. He added, "That's where we are right now with
ExxonMobil."
5:27:57 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 10, described the incremental
North Slope oil production. He said that the "big pools" -
Prudhoe Bay, Kuparuk, Endicott - are in decline. A lot of the
state's new production is going to come from smaller, newer
pools, expansions from the older pools, infield drilling, and
viscous oil pools.
5:28:54 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 11 and historic and projected
oil production from 1976-2002, stated that the production trend
on the North Slope is most likely in a slow, steady decline.
Unless, however, a major field is discovered, which would still
require a lot of new development, wells, and investment in
projects.
5:29:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GUTTENBERG inquired as to how far out the
production curve would continue, and if it would continue down
to the "bottom" or "level out."
5:30:22 PM
MR. VAN DYKE explained that it would depend on numerous factors,
two being the price of oil and the cost to transport the oil to
the "market." As long as the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System
(TAPS) tariff remains reasonable, and the marine transportation
costs don't skyrocket, there's no reason that the TAPS rate
can't decrease substantially from where it is today. In
addition, there's no reason that tankers can't continue to take
oil to the west coast. He said that operating costs need to
stay in line on the North Slope. As long as money is being
generated on the North Slope at that wellhead, companies are
going to continue to produce oil; with the strategic
reconfiguration of the TAPS tariff, companies will be in
business on the North Slope for a long time to come.
5:32:08 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG inquired as to whether the DOR made a
presentation to the House Finance Committee. He asked, "What
were the production figures for the upcoming years?" In
addition, Representative Rokeberg asked Mr. Van Dyke if he had
any input [in that presentation].
5:32:27 PM
MR. VAN DYKE confirmed that the DOG worked with the DOR to put
together the volume forecast, which is included in the DOR's
source book.
MR. VAN DYKE, in response to questions from Representative
Rokeberg, said that the volume forecast is in the FY 2007
budget. He opined that the figures are "pretty reasonable",
with approximately 850 million of barrels per day.
5:33:23 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 12 and oil and gas incentives,
explained the various ways to approach royalty reduction.
There's currently a preliminary decision for Pioneer Unit's
project, Oooguruk on the North Slope, which is offshore west of
Kuparuk. The DOG is currently taking comments on the
preliminary decision. It would be the first formal royalty
modification under AS 38.05.180(j) for a field that has yet to
produce. He said that there's also a program in Cook Inlet, a
more mechanical program, which is based on production rates from
platforms. The royalty mechanically "stair-steps" down as
production from the platforms decline below a certain level.
The numbers are where they need to be in order to keep the
platforms alive.
MR. VAN DYKE explained that while royalty reduction is one
incentive, there are also a couple exploration incentive credit
programs. Under "AS 41 credits", when a company applies for a
credit and earns the credit, its well data becomes public in two
years. A company can't hold the data confidential, and on the
seismic, geophysical side, the commissioner has the authority to
show the geophysical data to other parties interested in seeing
it. As a result, companies are hesitant to use the exploration
incentive credit under the "AS 41 program," which sunsets in
2007. He said that the state also has a discovery royalty
program in Cook Inlet that is "alive and well."
5:36:16 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 13, stated that the tax
incentive program is "where the action is these days", both in
Cook Inlet and on the North Slope. The tax incentive program
sunsets in 2007. He opined that the program is "working well",
noting that the sunset was extended for areas south of the North
Slope, but not for the North Slope. He informed the committee
that there are companies that have exploration plans beyond 2007
that would like to see the program continued. There have been
credits of about $14 million granted thus far.
5:38:02 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SAMUELS, referring to slide 12, asked what the
state is getting out of the deal if it is paying for up to 25
percent of the drilling costs.
5:38:41 PM
MR. VAN DYKE explained that if the production tax is "zeroed
out", the state would still be entitled to property taxes, and
local boroughs may or may not get "first dibs" on the property
tax revenue. The state would get the income tax as well as the
revenue sharing on the royalty. For example, with the National
Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A), the state receives 50 percent
revenue sharing on the royalty, whereas on most other federal
lands, the state receives 90 percent revenue sharing.
5:39:19 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG stated that there seems to be an issue
about how much the state realizes, from a 50 percent position in
NPR-A, from federally generated royalties. The North Slope
Borough has an impact statement to the "tune of" [$]5.8 million,
and the amount available is [$'4.5 million; the North Slope
Borough has been impacted to a greater degree, and any revenue
for this calendar year is "zero" to the State of Alaska.
5:40:20 PM
MR. VAN DYKE said that he wouldn't disagree with Representative
Rokeberg's "accounting". The other benefit for the incentive
program, and one of the primary reasons it was instituted, is
that if the DNR grants a credit under "AS 41", the state is able
to see the information from a "well on federal land", or a "well
on private land" standpoint. It's part of the trade for
granting the incentive credit; the state wouldn't see either the
data the geophysical data or the well data otherwise.
5:41:16 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, in response to Representative Rokeberg's question,
clarified that AS 38.05.180 has been "on the books for a good 15
years" and that the tax incentives listed on slide 13 are the
more recently adopted credits.
5:42:06 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG asked if the "frontier" area is 10
miles.
5:42:11 PM
MR. VAN DYKE clarified, "20 miles, 20 and 40." Referring to
slide 14, he opined that the State of Alaska areawide oil and
gas lease sales program is "doing well." The state has the same
five competitive lease sales every year. The DOG delayed the
North Slope and Beaufort Sea sale from October to March 1st
because it wanted to have the Alaska Peninsula sale by itself in
attempt to highlight the sale and garner more interest. Also,
the state is currently trying to decide whether to keep that
schedule. He opined that the size of the leases and the terms
seem to work "okay." By law, the primary term has to be
somewhere between five and ten years, but it's the
commissioner's call. The commissioner also sets the royalty
rate, with the minimum rate being 12.5 percent.
5:43:59 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 15, discussed the competitive
lease sale areas and their sizes in comparison to other states.
For example, part of the North Slope basin is about the size of
Kansas, and the Cook Inlet basin is about the size of New
Jersey.
5:44:43 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referred to slide 16, which he said displayed the
Alaska Peninsula lease sale. In terms of oil and gas, the
Alaska Peninsula is a remote area. There is no recent/modern
seismic information, so it's "high risk" from a geology and
geophysics standpoint. He said that the state needs to work on
generating more information for potential bidders.
5:45:56 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 17, described the exploration
licensing program. The program is for areas where there aren't
competitive oil and gas lease sales. One can't apply for an
exploration license on the North Slope around Prudhoe Bay or in
the middle of Cook Inlet. He said that there's a program where
one can apply for an area up to 500,000 acres. It's not a
competitive lease-type process, rather one bids a work
commitment, which is how much money one is going to spend to do
fieldwork, collect seismic information, and drill wells. One
has an exclusive right for the license area. There is a license
area near Nenana and licenses in the upper Susitna area.
5:47:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GUTTENBERG, in regard to the Nenana Basin, asked
what's scheduled to occur this winter.
5:47:16 PM
MR. VAN DYKE answered that Andex Resources LLC is trying to get
financing together to get a well drilled. Forest Oil
Corporation in the Susitna area is "shooting seismic" this
winter. He said that there was a license area near Glennallen
and a well was drilled. An aspect of the program is that one
can convert part or all of one's license area to conventional
oil and gas leases, and the license holders in that area chose
to convert part of their license area to conventional oil and
gas leases. The DOG has two proposed licenses for which it's
currently working on best interest findings - one near Healy and
one near Holitna. For the licensing program, the DOG has to do
a site-specific best interest finding for each individual
license application.
5:49:11 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referred to slide 18 regarding North Slope oil and
gas activities and discoveries. He said that in the legacy
field, there's certainly a lot of "well work" occurring.
5:50:25 PM
REPRESENTATIVE GUTTENBERG asked if there have been any requests
for leases in the Umiat area.
5:50:50 PM
MR. VAN DYKE confirmed that there are a "few" leases on state
land in the Umiat area. It's right in between the NPR-A and
state lands boundary. The Arctic Slope region also has some
mineral rights in that area, and there's a company that's been
promoting that area for the last couple of years; so there's
some leases in that area. In the legacy fields - Kuparuk,
Prudhoe Bay, and Endicott - there is a lot of well work
occurring right now, especially with the high commodity prices.
In addition, there are a lot of expansions in the newer fields.
In regard to exploration, he mentioned that there aren't as many
wells being drilled as the state would like to see, and that the
new entrants on the North Slope have done "pretty well" the last
couple of years.
5:52:36 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 19 and North Slope development
activities, stated that there is well work and development of
some of the viscous oil reservoirs in Prudhoe Bay. With respect
to Pioneer Unit and Kerr-McGee, he said that if they do get
their projects sanctioned, there will be two new operators on
the North Slope.
5:53:24 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 20 and Cook Inlet oil and gas
activities and discoveries, stated that in regard to natural
gas, the gas business is "good" in Cook Inlet; gas exploration
is continuing and there are quite a few companies that are
active. For the most part, there is on-shore activity/on-shore
exploration. In regard to oil, Mr. Van Dyke is "a little more
worried" because there is limited oil exploration. There are
only one [or 2] wells targeting oil prospects on-shore; there
are oil prospects off-shore, but they require a "jack-up rig"
that comes from outside to explore in Cook Inlet, and that is a
costly process. He added, "It costs about as much to bring a
rig into Cook Inlet and then to return it as it does to actually
go out and drill the well," and commented that production of oil
in Cook Inlet is declining.
5:55:14 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 21, listed some of the more
recent wells on the North Slope, in Cook Inlet, and in the
Copper River Basin. On the North Slope, Kerr-McGee was active
last year as was Pioneer Unit, but both were partners in the
wells, not the operators. ConocoPhillips is still "very active"
on the North Slope, more towards the west and towards NPR-A.
5:56:09 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SAMUELS requested a list by company of
exploration wells drilled in the past 10 years, on the North
Slope.
5:56:23 PM
MR. VAN DYKE confirmed that he would provide that to the
committee.
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG suggested that Mr. Van Dyke create a
similar list regarding Cook Inlet.
5:56:49 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 22, discussed the number of
exploration wells per year. The DOG has been working on making
information readily available for the public, in order to
increase the number of exploration wells per year.
5:57:53 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 23, listed the recent new units
on the North Slope: Whiskey Gulch-Brooks Range, Rock Flour-ENI,
Jacob's Ladder-Anadarko, Cronus-ConocoPhillips, and NE Storms-
Pioneer Unit.
5:58:18 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, in response to a question from Representative
Rokeberg, informed the committee that Brooks Range is a company
that Ken Thompson, a former ARCO president is involved in.
Referring to slide 24, regarding units, participating areas, and
unit actions per year, Mr. Van Dyke stated that there has been
an increase in unit actions per year. As oil and gas
development expands in Alaska, the demand for timely unit
decisions and evaluations by the division continues to increase.
5:59:36 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide 25, an excerpt from the DOG's
budget, explained the division's contribution to the mission of
the DNR.
6:00:33 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG, stating that he was looking at the
"recent new units", asked whether there's a level of discovery
before unitizing.
6:00:55 PM
MR. VAN DYKE confirmed that there are no discoveries in those
units to date, and informed the committee that one can unitize
ahead of a discovery.
6:01:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SAMUELS announced that Dan Seamount from the
Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (AOGCC) was online if
anyone had any questions to ask him.
6:01:21 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide one of the handout entitled
"Oil and Gas Permitting", said that one needs a permit from the
DOG if one is operating on a state lease. In addition, one
needs a "plan of operations" approval from the DOG, as well as
approvals from other state, federal, and/or local agencies. The
number of permits required is dependent on the location, habitat
impacted, animals/species present, operation time of year, and
the scope of the project. The DOG also issues geophysical
exploration permits and miscellaneous land use permits.
However, one doesn't need an oil and gas lease to collect
seismic information, and an oil and gas lease doesn't give one
exclusive use of the surface.
6:03:15 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide two, explained that the
division has a public comment period, and that if one is in a
coastal zone, a public comment period is also available during
the coastal consistency review. Not every application is
treated the same, but they all receive some form of public
notice. When the DOG's authorizations are issued, they include
some sort of mitigation measures. The DOG's leases have some
stipulations and mitigation measures, while the permits have
additional stipulations and mitigation measures. Furthermore,
the DOG requires bonding for activities on state land.
6:04:08 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide number 3, informed the
committee that the DOG's permitting application process is not
"new age". The division has testing of on-line permit
applications scheduled, and is hoping to have them online within
the next year.
6:04:32 PM
MR. VAN DYKE, referring to slide four, listed some of the
permits that may be required by entities other than the DOG. He
said that it would be difficult to write general permits and/or
areawide permits, because they're so location-specific and so
project-specific. However, there are general permits for
exploration, ice roads, and seismic surveys.
6:07:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG expressed his concern about the changing
of the annual lease sale dates.
MR. VAN DYKE stated that the issue is currently being discussed
with the commissioner.
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG asked if the DOG has talked to industry
representatives to see what their concerns would be.
6:08:41 PM
MR. VAN DYKE stated that the division is aware that the North
Slope and Cook Inlet sales are currently the premier sales,
adding "Alaska Peninsula hopefully will one day be there too."
REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG commented that the DOG has been good at
nominating land in the past.
6:09:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KURT OLSON, Alaska State Legislature, asked if
there has been any movement on Point Thompson.
6:09:20 PM
MR. VAN DYKE acknowledged that Point Thompson is one of key
fields involved in the gasline negotiation, but the timeline has
been delayed until May 2006.
6:10:10 PM
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the committee, the House
Special Committee on Oil and Gas meeting was adjourned at 6:10
p.m.
| Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
|---|